Profile: Abhisit Vejjajiva

Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva is the English-born, Oxford-educated 44-year-old leader of Thailand’s Democrat Party.

Young and photogenic, though not known as particularly dynamic, he has a reputation for “clean politics”.

Distinctly upper-class, Mr Abhisit hails from a wealthy family of Thai-Chinese origin. Both his parents were medical professors.

He was born in the British city of Newcastle in 1964 and educated at England’s top public school, Eton. He then went on to gain a degree in politics, philosophy and economics (PPE) at Oxford University.

Mr Abhisit’s support is drawn mainly from southern Thailand and from Bangkok’s educated middle-classes. He has had less success in attracting the support of working class and rural Thais.

In 1992, Mr Abhisit joined Thailand’s oldest party, the Democrats and, at the age of 27, entered parliament as one of its youngest ever members. Having tried and failed to become party leader in 2001, he eventually got the post in 2005.

Championing a raft of populist policies, Mr Abhisit campaigned under the slogan “Putting People First”.

The Democratic Party failed to win power at national elections, but in December 2008 a Constitutional Court ruling removed from power the government led by allies of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra.

Amid the turmoil of the airport blockade caused by anti-Thaksin protesters, a few Thaksin loyalists changed sides.

This enabled Mr Abhisit to form a new government and become the next prime minister without calling elections.

The Democrats are not openly allied to one group of protesters or the other.

But in the past the party has been closely associated with elements of the People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD), whose protests helped depose Mr Thaksin and his allies.

Mr Abhisit was criticised for his choice of foreign minister, Kasit Piromya, who was an open supporter of the PAD movement and its airport blockade.

Anti-corruption platform

While not entirely ditching the liberal reforms of “Thaksinomics” – a term used to refer to the economic set of policies of the exiled former leader – Mr Abhisit has argued for a more statist approach.

Among other things, Mr Abhisit has advocated free healthcare, a higher minimum wage, and free education, including textbooks and milk for nursery-school children.

He has also been a consistent campaigner against corruption.

When Mr Thaksin called a snap election in February 2006, Mr Abhisit’s campaign pitch was that he was “prepared to become a prime minister who adheres to the principle of good governance and ethics, not authoritarianism”.

Later that year, he opposed the military when it overthrew Mr Thaksin in a coup.

“We cannot and do not support any kind of extra-constitutional change, but it is done. The country has to move forward and the best way forward is for the coup leaders to quickly return power to the people and carry out the reforms they promised,” he said at the time.

The patrician also said he expected high standards of probity from his party and any government he led.

Going beyond the current transparency rules for Thai MPs, he said he would require all future Democrat Party representatives to declare their assets and any involvement in private companies. Currently, those measures apply only to cabinet members.

Academic

However, that has not shielded his government, or party, from corruption allegations, including claims of a cover-up of illegal donations by a petrochemical firm.

Before entering parliament, Mr Abhisit had a brief academic career. After Oxford, he taught at Thailand’s Chulachomklao Royal Military Academy.

Later, he returned to Oxford to study for a Master’s degree. He then taught economics at Thammasat University before studying law at Ramkhamhaeng University.

Mr Abhisit’s family is a circle of accomplished individuals. One of his two sisters is a professor of child psychology, while the other is a leading Thai author.

Mr Abhisit’s wife is a dentist-turned-mathematics lecturer at Chulalongkorn University. They have two children.

Among the chinks in the Abhisit armour are his failure, so far, to win the popular vote and the impression that his good looks tend to outshine his sometimes rather bland political pronouncements.

In March 2010, he was spirited away to a barracks when red-shirted opposition protesters marched on Bangkok for days of mass rallies, denouncing him as an illegitimate leader.

The prime minister may find that only the popular mandate of a national election win will ultimately silence his critics.

Ksaem Ksan Association

Ksaem Ksan Association held, Victims Demand

 

March 26, 2010

By: SUN Narin

The Association of Victims of Democratic Kampuchea called Ksaem Ksan, established to give a unified and strong voice to the victims of Khmer Rough regime, held its first workshop on March 20th.

            Mr. Chum Sirath, first deputy president of Ksaem Ksan Association, said in the conference that the association, to date, has registered 451 members among which there are 325 women and 126 men, living in 17 provinces. His association is supported by the member’s contribution.

            He added that the genocidal victims demanded the construction of a stele in Tuol Sleng Genocidal Museum in order to name all of the 17 000 humans being killed

at Tuol Sleng and Cheung Ek during April 17, 1975 to January 6, 1979. They also requested that the bones already unearthed or to be unearthed at the two killing fields be preserved and not incinerated.

            He showed that the victim’s bones should not be burned despite the argument of the region. He hopes that one day DNA techniques will reveal filiations of these bones with living relatives, enabling family to identify the remains of their loved ones and organize ceremonies in their memory.

            During the trial of Kaing Guek Eave alias Duch, former chief of Tuol Sleng prison, the court requested the collective compensation for the victims by constructing the memorial museum to indicate to the deaths.

            Reach Sambath, chief of public affairs section of Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), said at the workshop that the court needs long time to consider on the compensation for victims since more-than-90% Cambodian people claim that they are the victims including former Khmer Rough board.

            He added that some victims demand memorial stele and others want museum for education and concentration and so on. Therefore, we need the agreement from the victims in response to the principle of national reconciliation.

To be noted that, Ksaem Ksan association was created in September, 2009 with the 33 founders traumatic from genocidal regime and officially listed in the Ministry of Interior on January 29, 2009.

Khmer Titanic

នាវាថាយថានិកខ្មែរដ៏ធំត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើង                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

 

ដោយសង្កេតថាប្រទេសកម្ពុជាមានការអភិវឌ្ឍ និងរីកចំរើនលើគ្រប់វិស័យ ក្រោម​​​​​​​​​​​ការ​ដឹកនាំរបស់រាជរដ្ឋាភិបាលដែលមានសម្តេចអគ្គមហាសេនាបតីតេជោ ហ៊ុន​​​ សែន ជាប្រមុខ ជាពិសេសកំនើនទេសចរនៅក្នុងប្រទេសកម្ពុជា ​លោក អ៊ុយ អៀង​ហេង អាយុ ៥១ ឆ្នាំ ជាអាណិកជនខ្មែរនៅប្រទេសបារាំង មានគំនិត និងបាន​បោះទុន៤ ទៅ៥លានដុល្លា ដើម្បីបង្កើតកប៉ាល់ទេសចរណ៍ដ៏ធំមួយ លំដាប់ថ្នាក់អន្តរជាតិ ដែល​ជាស្នាដៃ និង​គំនិតច្នៃប្រឌិតរបស់កូនខ្មែរសុធសាធ​។ កប៉ាល់ដែលធំបំផុតនៅកម្ពុជា​​

មាន​ឈ្មោះថា “មេគង្គខ្មែរ” មានទទឹង ១៧ម៉ែត្រ បណ្តោយជាង ៩០ម៉ែត្រ និងកម្ពស់ ជាង២០​ម៉ែត្រ (៦ជាន់) កំពុងតែត្រូវបានស្ថាបនាឡើងនៅលើផ្ទៃទឹក អែបនឹង​ច្រាំង​ទន្លេ​មេគង្គ​។​

          លោក ជឺ ហៃ អាយុ ៤២ឆ្នាំ ត្រូវជាប្អូន និងអ្នកតំណាងរបស់លោក អ៊ុយ

អៀង​ហេង បានប្រសាសន៍ដោយទឹកមុខញញឹមថា បងប្រុសរបស់លោក និងលោក មានគំនិតបង្កើតកប៉ាល់ទេសចរណ៍នេះយូរមកហើយ រហូតមកដល់ខែមីនា ឆ្នាំ២០០៨

គំរោងសាងសង់កប៉ាល់នេះ ក៏បានលេចរូបរាងឡើង ហើយនៅខែមេសា ឆ្នាំ២០០៨

លោកក៏បានចាប់ផ្តើមសាងសង់វា ដោយប្រើស្ថាបត្យករខ្មែរ និងបរទេស(ជាពិសេស

បារាំង) និងកម្មករជាង ១០០នាក់។

          លោកបានបន្តថា រហូតមកដល់ពេលនេះ ការសាងសង់កប៉ាល់នេះ មានរយៈ

ពេលជិត២ឆ្នាំហើយ និងលទ្ធផលទទួលបានជិត៩០ភាគរយហើយ។ លោកសង្ឃឹមថា

កប៉ាល់នេះនឹងត្រូវបានសាងសង់ចប់ជាស្ថាពរនៅខែតុលា ឆ្នាំ ២០១០ ហើយមាន​គំរោង​បើក​សម្ភោធអោយប្រើប្រាស់ជាផ្លូវការនៅថ្ងៃទី១០ ខែតុលា ឆ្នាំ២០១០នេះ។

          ទាក់ទងនឹងការសាងសង់ លោកនិយាយថា គ្រោងឆ្អឹងកប៉ាល់បានបង្កើតរួច

ហើយ នៅសល់តែការរៀបចំសំអាត ការរចនា ការតុបតែង   និងបំពាក់គ្រឿង​សង្ហារឹម​ផ្សេងៗ ដើម្បីអោយវាមានលក្ខណៈល្អប្រណិត និងស្របតាមស្តង់ដារ។ លោក​សើច….. ហើយ​និយាយ​ថា រហូតមកដល់ពេលនេះ លោកចំណាយទឹកប្រាក់អស់ជាង ១លានដុល្លា​ហើយ ប៉ុន្តែអ្វីដែលត្រូវចំណាយច្រើនជាងនេះ គឺការតុបតែង រចនា​ផ្សេង​ៗ​។

          លោកបានបន្ថែមថា កប៉ាល់នេះប្រៀបដូចជាសណ្ឋាគារលើទឹកអញ្ជឹង ព្រោះ

ថា វាមានបន្ទប់សម្រាប់ស្នាក់នៅជាង១០០បន្ទប់ ភោជនីយដ្ឋាន អាងហែលទឹក បន្ទប់

ហាត់ប្រាណ កន្លែងស្ទីម  សូណាផ្សេងៗ​ ហើយអាចដាក់មនុស្សបានប្រហែល ១៥០០នាក់។

          ទោះជាយ៉ាងណាក៏ដោយ លោកក៏បានបញ្ជាក់ពីការលំបាកក្នុងការធ្វើកប៉ាល់​នេះ​ថា​”វាមានការលំបាកមែនទែន….. ពិបាកជាងគេនោះ​​ គឺខ្វះសម្ភារៈផ្គត់ផ្គង់ និង​ប្រើ​ប្រាស់ ព្រោះយើងធ្វើ​ដោយ​ដៃសុធសាធ”។ លោកបានប្រាប់ថា”ខ្ញុំមិនទាន់សង្ឃឹម​​​១០០% ​ថាខ្ញុំនឹង​អាច​​​ទទួលបានជោគជ័យលើកប៉ាល់នេះទេ ប៉ុន្តែខ្ញុំនឹងខិតខំអោយ​អស់​​​​ពីសមត្ថ​ភាព​ដើម្បី​ទាក់​ទាញភ្ញៀវទេសចរណ៍ជាតិ និងអន្តរជាតិអោយមកស្នាក់នៅ និង​លេងកំសាន្ត​នៅលើកប៉ាល់នេះ”។

លោក​បាន​បន្ថែម​​ទៀតថា នាវាទេសចរណ៍នេះ​នឹង​ចល័ត​តិច​តួច​​បំផុត ហើយវានឹងធ្វើ​ចរាចរណ៍ពី​​ស្ពានជ្រោយចង្វា កាត់តាមមុខវាំងឆ្ពោះទៅកោះដាច់ដើម្បីនាំ​អ្នកទេស​ចរណ៍​​​​​គយគន់​ទេសភាព​​​តាមដៃទន្លេសាប ទស្សនា​ក្រុង​ភ្នំពេញ​ត្រង់ទន្លេចតុមុខ និងគយគន់ទេសភាពតាមដងទន្លេមេគង្គតែប៉ុណ្ណោះ។

          លោកបានបង្ហាញពីអារម្មណ៍របស់លោកថាលោកមានចិត្តសប្បាយរីករាយ​​ណាស់ដែលបានបង្កើតនាវាទេសចរណ៏ថាយថានិកកម្ពុជាដ៏ធំនេះសម្រាប់បង្ហាញជូន

ខ្មែរយើង ហើយលោកសង្ឃឹមថា កប៉ាល់យក្សរបស់លោកនឹងអាចស្រូបយកភ្ញៀវទេស

ចរណ៏បរទេសតាមរយៈក្រុមហ៊ុនទេសចរណ៍នានានៅក្នុងប្រទេសកម្ពុជា។

គួរបញ្ជាក់ថា  លោកជឺ ហៃសង្ឃឹមថាកប៉ាល់របស់លោកនឹងត្រូវបាន​​ចាត់​​ជា​ចំណាត់​​ថ្នាក់សណ្ឋាគារលំដាប់ផ្កាយបី ពីក្រសួងទេសចរណ៍ ហើយលោក លោកមាន​បំណងបង្កើតកប៉ាល់តូចៗ​២ទៀត​ប្រហែល​ជា​១៥-២០បន្ទប់​ សម្រាប់ដឹក​ភ្ញៀវ​ទេស​ចរណ៍ដែលចង់ទៅលេងឆ្ងាយៗ ដូចជា​ខេត្ត​ក្រចេះ ស្ទឹងត្រែង និង សៀមរាប។

 

Socrates’ Biography

 

Who Was Socrates? Socrates was a gifted thinker of ancient Athens who helped lay the foundation of

western philosophy. The methods he used and the concepts he proposed, along with his courageous

defense of his ideas against his enemies, profoundly influenced the philosophical and moral tenor of

western thought over the centuries. His refusal to compromise his intellectual intregrity in the face of a

death sentence set an example for all the world to follow.

What Is Philosophy? Philosophy is a discipline that attempts to identify the basic principles governing all

existing things, as well as the makeup of these things, through investigations that rely on the application

of reason rather than faith. Unlike science, philosophy permits intelligent speculation, via logical

arguments, on what is or is not true. For example, the great Italian philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas

(1225-1274) used reason alone to form his famous arguments for the existence of God. In developing his

ideas, Aquinas relied heavily on the philosophy of Aristotle, who was a pupil of Plato. Plato, in turn, was a

pupil of Socrates. The word philosophy comes from the Greek word philosophia, meaning love of

wisdom.

.

Key Facts About Socrates

.

Birth and Death: Socrates was born in Athens in 469 B.C. He was executed in 399 B.C. after a trial in

which he was found guilty of promoting dangerous ideas.

Imprisonment and Execution: Socrates spent one month on death row before being forced to drink

poison made from the hemlock plant. Drinking hemlock was the method of capital punishment in ancient

Athens. This mode of execution was like modern “lethal injection” except that the condemned prisoner

drank death rather than receiving it through a vein.

Parents: Socrates’s father was Sophroniscus, a sculptor or stonemason (according to unverifiable

accounts), and his mother was Phaenarete, a midwife.

Wife, Children: Socrates had two wives, Xanthippe and Myrto. Whom he married first is uncertain. There

is speculation that he married one of these women while he was still married to the other under an

Athenian decree allowing a man more than one wife to replenish the depleted population of Athens.

Socrates had three children: Lamprocles, probably the son of Xanthippe, and Sophroniscus and

Menexenus, probably the sons of Myrto. It is believed that Xanthippe was a nagging, scolding wife. If she

was, in fact, a shrew, she may have done humankind a service by driving Socrates out of the house,

providing him opportunities to conduct his philosophical investigations among the people of Athens.

Residence: As an adult, Socrates lived at Alopece, a deme (suburb) southeast of of Athens.

Education: In his youth, Socrates studied, music, literature, geometry, and gymnastics. He also

familiarized himself with the beliefs of leading philosophers. Like other Greeks, he extolled the works of

the Greek epic poet Homer.

Early Work: It is believed that Socrates worked for a while as a sculptor and, according to one account,

completed statues on the Acropolis of the three Graces (Aglaia, Thalia, and Euphrosyne), who were sister

goddesses associated with charm, grace, beauty, and fertility.

Military Duty: Socrates served with honor in the Peloponnesian War against Sparta, fighting bravely at

the battles of Potidaeia, Delium, and Amphipolus. At Potidaeia, he rescued his wounded friend,

Alcibiades, from the battlefield. At Delium years later, he saved the life of his friend Xenophon, who had

been trapped under a fallen horse.

Later Work: After giving up manual labor, Socrates devoted his life to helping his fellow citizens see the

light of truth. His laboratory and classroom were the streets of Athens.

Appearance: Socrates was a short man with an ugly face. His most noticeable facial feature was a broad

nose above a bushy handlebar mustache and a beard. He walked barefooted, always directly connected

to the humility of dirt and dust. He wore a simple, unadorned himation, a robe-like garment wrapped about

the body.

Online Images of Socrates: Many images of Socrates are accessible via this Google link, but please

respect the provisions of copyright laws for images not in the public domain.

Personality and Lifestyle: Socrates was a man of charm and wit who made many friends. However,

because of his unvarnished candor and support of anti-democratic politicians and political ideas, he also

made many enemies even though it is said that he

never spoke in anger against anyone. Socrates apparently inherited a modest estate from his father–

enough, at least, to live on. He frequently spoke of having “visions” or “hearing voices.” However, he was

probably using these terms as metaphors for his intellect or conscience. It is said that he sometimes fell

into a day-long, immobilizing trance in which he worked on philosophical problems and listened to his

inner voice. According to Xenophon, he even went into such trances on the field of war.

Social Life: Socrates enjoyed attending symposiums. These were drinking parties, held after a dinner, for

the elite of Athens. Symposiums featured games, music, gossip, and exchanges of ideas. Tongues

loosened by alcohol would wag freely about politics, religion, war, and philosophy. Socrates drank his fill

at these gatherings but remained sober and in command of his formidable intellect. During the day,

Socrates would talk with people he encountered on the street, using the opportunity to question them

about their views on justice, piety, courage, and other virtues by which human beings live. His pointed

questions–and the inability of his listeners to answer them satisfactorily–showed them that their

knowledge was incomplete or tainted with faulty ideas. Many of the brightest young men of Athens

followed Socrates through the streets to observe him in action. They no doubt enjoyed watching him

make a fool of pompous politicians or supposed wise men whose beliefs and teachings were founded on

air.

Detailed Biographies of Socrates: You Infoplease access New Advent

Sources of Information About Socrates: Since Socrates himself never wrote a book and did not keep a

diary, all of the information about him comes from other writers. Chief among these writers was Plato

(427-347), who focused part or all of the following famous dialogues on Socrates.

…………..Apology..|..Charmides..|..Cratylus..|..Critias..|..Crito..|..Euthydemus..|..Euthyphro..|..Gorgias

…………..Ion..|..Laches..|..Lysis..|..Menexenus..|..Parmenides..|..Phaedo..|..Phaedrus..|..Philebus

…………..Republic..|..Sophist..|..Statesman..|..Symposium..|..Theaetetus..|..Timaeus

Among others who wrote about Socrates or mentioned him in their works were Xenophon (431-350 B.C.),

a friend of Socrates; Aristophanes (450-388 B.C.), a playwright who satirized Socrates in The Clouds, a

comedy; Aristotle (384-322 B.C.), a pupil of Socrates; Plutarch (46-119 A.D.), a Greek biographer and

historian who mentions Socrates often in Parallel Lives; and Diogenes Laërtius, a Greek author who lived

between 200 and 300 A.D. Laërtius wrote Lives and Opinions of the Eminent Philosophers: Life of

Socrates.

Contributions of Socrates

One: Awakened thinkers to the need to examine and reexamine their political, moral, and philosophical

views in order to discover and root out errors and misconceptions that impede progress. Socrates

accomplished this task by demonstrating, through cross-examination of people he encountered, that

many accepted precepts, conventions, and beliefs were based on faulty logic or outright errors. A

quotation attributed to him states: “The unexamined life is not worth living.” In other words, a human being

must not be complacent and self-satisfied; instead, he must be ever probing, exploring, and

reconnoitering his soul in order to discover ways to imrpove.

Two: Effectively rebutted a central tenet of the Sophists , traveling teachers who charged fees for

educating young men. This tenet maintained that the guiding principles of a society, such as justice and

truth, were relative concepts–that is, they changed according to the needs of men in a particular time and

place. What was considered right and just in Athens was not necessarily right and just in another society,

the Sophists maintained. One man’s virtue could be another man’s vice.

Three: Pioneered the use of inductive reasoning to draw logical conclusions. According to Aristotle,

Socrates founded the “scientific method.”

Four: Demonstrated that wrongdoing results from ignorance. If a man lies, Socrates might have said, he

does so because he does not understand the benefits of telling the truth.

Five: Inspired philosophers in his own time and in later times to pursue the truth through rigorous analysis

of available, facts, opinions, and so on. Two of the most important philosophers in the history of the world,

Plato and Aristotle, both esteemed Socrates as a supreme thinker and infused their philosophical systems

with Socratic thought. Plato was a pupil of Socrates, and Aristotle was a pupil of Plato.

Six: Showed the world the meaning of integrity and moral commitment by accepting a death sentence

rather than recanting his principles.

Seven: Made clear that a human being is more than his appearance. Socrates was ugly, wore old

clothes, and walked barefooted through the streets of Athens. But his mind and the words he spoke were

beautiful.

.

Religious Beliefs of Socrates

.

…….Socrates believed in a god or gods and in the immortality of the soul. He often referred to “God” in

the singular but also spoke of “gods.” He argued that an intelligent being was behind the construction of

the universe, a teleological argument that influenced many later philosophers. The best prayer, Socrates

said, was one in which a person simply asked God to work his will, since he knew best.

.

Socrates at Age 70, Before the Trial

The Old Philosopher as Viewed by the Imagination Through the Lens of History

By Michael J. Cummings © 2004

…….Socrates was old now, more than 70. Yet he still roamed the streets of Athens–barefooted, as

always–to help men purge their minds of faulty or outmoded ideas. Such ideas, Socrates knew, impeded

self-improvement and community progress.

…….Over the years, the great god above had come to him time and again in visions and trances to remind

him that it was his calling to sow the seeds of curiosity in fallow intellectual soil. And to do this, he first had

to pull the weeds and the dying plants–misconceptions, unfounded beliefs, flawed principles. So it was

that he went about the city to uproot ignorance where he found it, even in men deemed wise by the

community. He would nettle them with questions that they could not answer, showing them that their

knowledge was shallow rather than deep.

…….Limber, quick of step, Socrates could range across the city proper on a hot day–up steps, down hills,

through pressing crowds in the marketplace. All along the way he stopped to talk with anyone, even the

fishmonger selling fresh catch from the Bay of Phaleron. To him, Socrates might have posed this

question:

…….“What is a fish?”

…….The fish merchant might have answered, “A legless creature that swims in the ocean.”

…….To this, Socrates might have replied:

…….“The octopus and the whale are legless creatures that swim in the ocean. Are they fish?”

…….The fishmonger might then have scratched his head and realized his definition of fish was faulty.

…….Socrates was a short, ugly man with a simmian nose and beefy lips–unprepossessing in every way, a

lump of wrinkling flesh that passed for a human–but his tongue could wag with charm and wit. It was not

uncommon for the young to gather round him on the walkway of a stoa or the greensward of a temple to

hear him expose a supposedly wise man as a fool, thereby setting him on the road to knowledge, or to

hear Socrates expound on the importance of nurturing the development of the soul and its grasp of

morality, ethics, and the universe.

…….Once upon a time, Theaetetus–a teenager of uncommon intelligence– would follow and listen to the

old philosopher with other young men. One day Socrates asked Theaetetus to define knowledge. An easy

question, Theaetetus thought. He replied that skill at geometry was knowledge. So was the ability to

repair footwear. So were carpentry and all the other crafts. It was clear to Theaetetus that knowledge was

capability, artistry, the wherewithal to perform a useful activity. He was no doubt proud that he provided an

altogether suitable and unimpeachable answer. Socrates’s eyes rolled as the answer passed through his

ears and registered in the remote recesses of his brain.

…….Theaetetus, like Socrates, was not pleasing to look at. The gods had shaped both men with unsteady

hands, perhaps after a night of revelry, and dropped them out of the heavens unfinished, save for their

minds. Could the ill-formed Theaetetus have endeared himself to the ill-formed Socrates? It is not at all

unreasonable to assume so. But if there was a bond between Theaetetus and Socrates, it did nothing to

blunt the sharp edge of Socrates’s reply: Skill at geometry was not knowledge, Socrates said. Nor was

the ability to mend sandals or erect a temple. A spider may be skilled at spinning a web and a bird skilled

at building a nest, Socrates may have said. But their actions were not knowledge. Similarly, a man’s ability

to work geometric problems was an action indicating that he possessed knowledge; however, such an

ability was not knowledge itself. Knowledge was something else–something less obvious, something

more complex, something in the human soul.

…….Theaetetus, benefiting by the lesson, went on in the years to come to become a great mathematician,

helping to develop the theory of irrational quantities, thereby radically altering for the better humankind’s

understanding of numbers and computations. It cannot be said, of course, that Socrates contributed

directly to the development of this theory, but it can be surmised that he helped shape Theaetetus’s

comprehension of what constitutes a definition or statement of principles.

…….Under the questioning of Socrates, many other young men also went on to see beneath the veneer of

things, or beyond the boundaries of traditional thought. The philosopher Plato, his most famous pupil,

developed into one of the most important philosophers in the history of western civilization.

…….However, not all of Socrates’s listeners accepted his peripatetic critiques. Proud men, celebrated as

wise by the populace, balked at the philosopher’s characterization of them as empty vessels that echoed

with ignorance. Here was a dangerous man, they decided one day. In his zeal to challenge established

beliefs and traditions, Socrates was also injuring reputations. What was more he was leading the young

men of Athens astray. There was even talk that he was teaching them to reject the state gods in favor of a

supreme deity that possessed the fulness of truth and virtue.

…….One day, Socrates received a summons to appear before the people’s magistrate to face charges

brought by three of his enemies: the poet Meletus, the politician Anytus and the orator Lycon. In their

sworn affidavit, they accused Socrates of corrupting the youth of Athens and of promoting his own

divinities over the official gods of the state. The accusers appeared to represent members of a faction

long hostile to Socrates and his ideas. They despised him not only for the reasons cited by Meletus,

Anytus, and Lycon, but also for his well-known opposition to democracy. Socrates had made it clear on

more than one occasion that democracy was a defective form of government because it granted common,

uneducated men on the street the right to vote and make important decisions. In addition, Socrates’s

enemies opposed him for his tutelage, support, and defense of politicians who were out of favor with the

ruling establishment (politicians who had fallen under his spell as young men).

…….One such politician was Alcibiades (450-404 B.C.). In his youth, he had everything a young Athenian

could hope for: wealth, good looks, intelligence, courage. He also had Socrates as a friend and mentor.

During the wars against Sparta, he and Socrates–his elder by 19 years–fought together at Potidaea in

432, where Socrates defended him when he was wounded. In 415, Alcibiades was to share command of

a force bound for the Sicilian city of Syracuse, allied with Sparta. However, before he and his troops

embarked, someone committed a grave offense against the messenger god, Hermes, vandalizing busts

of his image throughout Athens. The citizens blamed Alcibiades, rightly or wrongly. Although Alcibiades

denied the charge and requested an investigation, no investigation was conducted. After he arrived at

Sicily, Athens ordered him to return home. On his way back, he discovered that he had been condemned

to death. He then escaped to Sparta and informed its leaders of Athenian war plans. In 411, however, he

changed sides again after helping the Athenian fleet win an important victory, and he returned to Athens in

407 as an esteemed citizen and military commander. However, after he lost a naval battle, the Athenians

deposed him again and he moved to Phrygia (Turkey). But his enemies tracked him down, set his home

on fire, and murdered him when he was attempting to escape. Because Socrates had once befriended

and instructed Alcibiades, Socrates’s enemies maintained that Alcibiades had been acting on principles

taught by Socrates.

The Trial

…….Following is a condensed version of Socrates’s testimony, which I adapted from the account of the

trial presented by his pupil Plato and from observations by the Greek historian Xenophon and later

writers. Whether the accounts and observations of these men accurately reflect the tenor of the

proceedings against Socrates has never been established. Plato’s account in his dialogue The Apology

provides the most reliable information.

…….

…….After a hearing, the citizens indicted Socrates and called him to trial before the boule, a council of 500

citizens, acting as the jury. It was one of the most memorable trials in history because of Socrates’s cool

but defiant defense of his right to think. Plato, a pupil of Socrates, recorded the proceedings.

…….Under Athenian law, the accused conducted his own defense. However, the law permitted him to use

a speech prepared by an attorney. Such a speech was written for Socrates, but he rejected it, deciding

instead to rely solely on his own abilities. He also rejected the option of bringing his wife and sons to court

(who, through weeping and body language, could have won him sympathy), as was his right.

…….Led by Meletus, the accusers presented their case in a morning session that may have lasted three

hours. Then Socrates took the floor.

…….

Socrates Presents His Defense: A Condensed Adaptation of Plato’s Apology

Click here to access the complete text of The Apology (translated by Benjamin Jowett)

…….Good citizens of Athens, I am not a clever orator, although my accusers maintain otherwise

in their fear that I will use eloquence to sway people to my side. However, if by eloquence they

mean truthfulness, then I am eloquent, for I indeed speak the truth. I am old now, over 70, and I

beg you to judge me by my words and their meaning, not by my manner, since I am but a clumsy

newcomer to court proceedings.

…….Let me first tell you that the attacks against my character have old roots. In fact, when many

of you were just boys, there were those who began poisoning you against me, saying that I

committed evil and through clever arguments that I could make bad alternatives appear good,

and vice versa. You were impressionable then, easily swayed by their falsehoods. There are

many who have spoken ill of me, but I do not know their names–except for the dramatist

Aristophanes, who unjustly belittled me in his play The Clouds.

…….Among you in this assembly are men who know that I have been maligned, for they have

been with me during my conversations with people. I ask you to speak up, you who have heard

me. Tell your neighbors the truth so that they will know that I am innocent.

…….Then there are those who say that I teach for money. That charge has no basis in fact,

although there are some who make the rounds of cities to teach for money, such as Gorgias of

Leontium, Prodicus of Ceos, and Hippias of Elis. Young men who could learn for nothing from

their own citizens willingly pay these men. Right now a Parian named Evenus is living in Athens

to accept payment of five minae a lesson to teach. I know this from Callias, who pays Evenus to

teach his sons. Well, good for Evenus if it is true that he is wise enough to teach people. If I had

his knowledge I would be proud and self-satisfied. But the fact is, I really am ignorant.

…….Why, then, you might ask, do people say that I am wise? Why do they say I am evil? I will

explain.

…….There was a man–you may remember him–named Chaerephon, who was a friend of mine

and of the people. One day, he asked the oracle at Delphi whether anyone was wiser than I am.

The prophetess at Delphi said no man was wiser than I. Although Chaerephon has since died,

his brother is still alive and can confirm this answer.

…….Anyway, dumbfounded by this answer, I went to many supposedly wise men, including

politicians, to find one person who was wiser than I am. Surely there had to be someone who

knew more than I did. But everywhere I went, I found the people I interviewed wanting in wisdom

and told them so. Consequently, I made many enemies. I even talked with artistans, who thought

they were wise but really were not. Poets, I found, were excellent writers but did not comprehend

what they wrote. My listeners began to imagine that I claimed to have the wisdom that they

lacked. But the truth of the matter is this: The oracle called me wise because I am the only man

who realizes how little he knows. So, when I seek out wise people and discover that they know

little but think they know much, I am only demonstrating the truth of the oracle’s finding. As you

are aware, I have been absorbed by this task.

…….The young men who observe me later imitate what I do. When they expose esteemed men

as unwise, these latter men blame me for leading the youth astray. Going further, they say I

deliberately stir up trouble by challenging traditional beliefs and promoting strange religious

ideas, including my own gods.

…….But my chief accuser here, Miletus, is the one who is doing wrong. Although he professes to

be concerned about the youth of our community, he does not care about them at all. Tell me,

Miletus, is it better to live among good citizens or bad ones?

.

…….Miletus: Good ones.

…….Socrates: Is there someone who would rather be hurt than helped by people around him?

…….Miletus: No.

…….Socrates: Do I deliberately corrupt youth?

…….Miletus: Yes.

…….Socrates: All right, then, why would I want to corrupt people when I know that doing so will

make them want to harm me. You just agreed that no one would want to live around people he

knows would harm him. As for religion, do you accuse me of teaching different gods or of being

an atheist?

…….Miletus: You are an atheist.

…….Socrates: But you say I teach spiritual concepts and believe in strange divine beings. How

curious it is that I believe in gods and not believe in gods at the same time. The fact is, it appears

that you and others here are going to condemn me simply because I have the courage to tell the

truth. In this respect, I am like Achilles, the greatest of the Greek warriors in the Trojan War. He

knew that if he avenged the death of his friend Patroclus by killing the Trojan warrior Hector, he

was fated to die. But rather than live in disgrace, he killed Hector and died with honor. In my

case, if you offered to free me if I stopped practicing philosophy in my honest and truthful way, I

would reject your offer. As long as I live, I shall obey God and continue to tell the truth to anyone I

encounter. Of course, it would be foolhardy of you to execute me, for it would be hard to replace

a gadfly like me. God commissioned me to search for the truth, and I have done so with all my

heart to the extent that I have neglected my own needs for the sake of you. Since I was a child, a

divine voice has spoken to me, has given me signs, telling me to me to prod and question other

men in order to put them on the road toward true wisdom. But if I am evil, let the young men I

corrupted and their relatives come forth and speak against me. They will not, of course, because

they know that I am not evil.

.

…….By a vote of 280 to 220, the council finds Sophocles guilty and sentences him to death.

However, under Athenian law, a convicted person can propose an alternative sentence. Socrates

proposes a small fine and, in an act of defiance, suggests that he be allowed to dine at taxpayer

expense at a public table reserved for esteemed citizens of Athens. The council rejects his

proposal by an even larger vote. A month later, he is executed by the prescribed method of

capital punishment: drinking poison.

.